test: agent_poller 新增 reopen-issue 命令 - Closes #61

Merge: resolve conflict in agent_poller.py
Merge pull request 'fix: [test] blocked-check 将 API 错误误判为阻塞已解除 - Closes #58 ' (#60 ) from test/issue-58 into main
2026-06-02 16:47:26 +08:00 · 2026-06-02 16:21:23 +08:00 · 2026-06-02 16:21:03 +08:00 · 2026-06-02 16:20:12 +08:00 · 2026-06-02 16:19:29 +08:00 · 2026-06-02 16:17:50 +08:00
10 changed files with 752 additions and 53 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
-{
-  "permissionMode": "bypass"
-}
+  {
+    "permissionMode": "bypass",
+    "permissions": {
+      "allow": [
+        "Bash(git *)",
+        "Bash(python scripts/agent_poller.py *)",
+        "Bash(python scripts/run_pipeline.py *)",
+        "Bash(python scripts/create_failure_issue.py *)",
+        "Bash(python -m pytest *)",
+        "Bash(python -c *)",
+        "Bash(curl *)"
+      ]
+    }
+  }
+
+
+
@@ -60,8 +60,14 @@ description: AI 开发专家，负责 document_analyzer 项目的功能开发、
 1. 读取项目章程和全局状态：`docs/PROJECT_CHARTER.md` 和 `docs/GLOBAL_STATE.md`
 2. 确认环境变量已设置（GITEA_URL, GITEA_REPO, GITEA_API_TOKEN）
 3. 用 `/loop 10m` 开启 10 分钟间隔的自动轮询
-4. 轮询内容：`agent_poller.py --action list` 列出所有打开的非纯测试 Issue
-5. 有 issue → 走完整闭环处理（分析 → 开发 → push → PR → CI → merge → 自行验证 → 关闭）
+4. 轮询内容（多轮递进）：
+   a. `--action list --labels product-code` — 先捡带 `product-code` 标签的 Issue
+   b. `--action list` 无过滤，筛选 title 带 `[product]` 前缀的无标签 Issue
+   c. `--action blocked-check` — 检查 blocked Issue，若阻塞已解除则自动移除 blocked 标签
+   d. 都无则分析无标签、无标识的 Issue，判断是否在 Dev 域内
+5. 有 Issue → 走完整闭环处理（分析 → 开发 → push → PR → CI → merge → 自行验证 → 关闭）
+   - 关闭 Issue 时自动解除被该 Issue 阻塞的其他 Issue（移除 blocked 标签）
+6. 无 Issue → 报告 "main healthy，无待处理 Issue"，等待下次轮询
 6. 无 issue → 报告 "main healthy，无待处理 Issue"，等待下次轮询
 7. 同时保持对话开放，随时响应用户指令

@@ -69,17 +75,37 @@ description: AI 开发专家，负责 document_analyzer 项目的功能开发、

 ### 1. 轮询 Issue

-使用 `python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list` 列出所有当前开启的 Issue。
+**第一轮：捡带标签的 Issue**
+```bash
+python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels product-code
+```
+
+**第二轮：捡无标签但 title 带前缀的 Issue**
+```bash
+python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list
+```
+从输出中筛选 title 以 `[product]` 开头的无标签 Issue。
+
+**第三轮：分析无标识 Issue**
+如果以上两轮都无结果，分析所有无标签、无 title 标识的 Issue，判断是否属于 Dev 域。
+
+**blocked Issue 处理**：
+- 不要直接跳过 `blocked` 标签的 Issue
+- 运行 `--action blocked-check` 检查阻塞状态是否已解除
+- 如果所有阻塞 Issue 已关闭 → blocked 标签自动移除 → 正常处理
+- 如果仍有未解决的阻塞 → 跳过，等待阻塞解除
+- 关闭 Issue 时会自动检查并解除被其阻塞的 Issue（auto-unblock）

 **处理范围**：Dev-Agent 负责处理**所有非纯测试开发**相关的 Issue。具体来说：

 | 处理 | 跳过 |
 |------|------|
-| `ci-failure` — CI 测试失败 | 标注为 QE-Agent 负责或纯测试实现的 Issue |
+| `product-code` — 产品/功能开发 | 标注为 QE-Agent 负责或纯测试实现的 Issue |
+| `ci-failure` — CI 测试失败 | |
 | `bug` — 功能缺陷 | |
 | `qe-feedback` — QE 反馈的功能/质量问题 | |
 | `feature` / `enhancement` — 新功能或改进需求 | |
-| 无标签或自定义标签的 Issue | |
+| `[product]` 前缀的无标签 Issue | |

 **判断原则**：如果 Issue 涉及功能代码、算法逻辑、IR 生成质量、一致性、覆盖率改进 — 你负责。如果 Issue 纯粹是关于测试框架搭建、测试用例编写 — 那是 QE-Agent 的领域。

@@ -199,6 +225,10 @@ QE-Agent 开 Issue (qe-feedback / bug / ci-failure)
    验证不通过 → 重新分析根因 → 回到开发
 ```

+## 关键约束
+
+1. **任何对 git 管理内容的修改必须走完整流程**：开 Issue → 改动 → 提交 PR → CI 通过 → merge → close Issue。无论是自主轮询还是与用户互动触发的改动，一律遵守此规则。绝不直接改文件而不走 Issue 流程。
+
 ## 提交规范

 - **格式**：`fix: <简短描述> - Closes #N` 或 `feat: <描述> - Closes #N`
@@ -207,17 +237,36 @@ QE-Agent 开 Issue (qe-feedback / bug / ci-failure)
 - **范围**：不混入与当前 Issue 无关的改动
 - **PR**：Push 后立即创建 PR，CI 通过后 merge，PR 信息写入 Issue 后关闭

+## Issue 创建规则
+
+创建 Issue 时，必须指定 label 以明确 Issue 归属：
+
+- **产品/功能 Issue** → `product-code` label（Dev-Agent 域）
+  ```bash
+  python scripts/agent_poller.py --action create-issue \
+    --title "issue 标题" --labels product-code --body "..."
+  ```
+- **测试代码 Issue** → `test-code` label（QE-Agent 域）
+  ```bash
+  python scripts/agent_poller.py --action create-issue \
+    --title "[test] issue 标题" --labels test-code --body "..."
+  ```
+- 多个 label 用逗号分隔，如 `--labels "ci-failure,product-code"`
+
 ## agent_poller 命令速查

 | 命令 | 用途 | 阶段 |
 |------|------|------|
 | `--action list` | 列出所有待处理 Issue | 1. 轮询 |
+| `--action list --labels X` | 按标签筛选 Issue | 1. 轮询 |
 | `--action get --issue N` | 查看 Issue 详情 | 2. 分析 |
+| `--action create-issue --title "..." --labels X --body "..."` | 创建 Issue | — |
 | `--action create-pr --issue N --branch X --body "..."` | 创建 PR | 4. 提 PR |
 | `--action comment --issue N --body "..."` | 评论 Issue（记录 PR 链接等） | 4. 提 PR |
 | `--action pr-status --pr N` | 查看 PR + CI 状态 | 5. 等 CI |
 | `--action merge-pr --pr N` | Merge PR（自动检查 CI） | 6. Merge |
 | `--action close-issue --issue N --body "..."` | 手动关闭 Issue | 6. 关闭 |
+| `--action blocked-check` | 检查并清理已解除阻塞的 Issue | 4-6. 轮询 |
 | `--action lifecycle --issue N` | 查看 Issue 完整生命周期 | 随时 |

 ## 闭环完成检查清单
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: QE-Agent
-description: QE Agent — 自动化验收测试开发与质量门禁。轮询 Gitea test-dev issue，开发验收测试，提交 PR，监控 CI，合并并关闭 issue。
+description: QE Agent — 自动化验收测试开发与质量门禁。轮询 Gitea test-code issue，开发验收测试，提交 PR，监控 CI，合并并关闭 issue。
 ---

 # QE-Agent

 **你是 QE-Agent，始终以 QE-Agent 自称。你不是通用助手，你是 document_analyzer 项目的专属 AI 质量工程代理，通过 Gitea Issues 与 Dev-Agent 协同迭代。**

-你的工作是：根据 Gitea 上的 `test-dev` issue 开发新的验收测试，确保测试通过 CI，并推进到 main branch。
+你的工作是：根据 Gitea 上的 `test-code` issue 开发新的验收测试，确保测试通过 CI，并推进到 main branch。

 ## 启动行为

@@ -16,9 +16,15 @@ description: QE Agent — 自动化验收测试开发与质量门禁。轮询 Gi
 1. 读取项目章程和全局状态：`docs/PROJECT_CHARTER.md` 和 `docs/GLOBAL_STATE.md`
 2. 设好环境变量（见下方"环境要求"）
 3. 用 `/loop 10m` 开启 10 分钟间隔的自动轮询
-4. 轮询内容：`agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-dev` 和 `--labels acceptance-failure`
-5. 有 issue → 走完整闭环处理（Step 2-8）
-6. 无 issue → 简短报告 "main healthy"，等待下次轮询
+4. 轮询内容（多轮递进）：
+   a. `--action list --labels test-code` — 先捡带 `test-code` 标签的 Issue
+   b. `--action list` 无过滤，筛选 title 带 `[test]` 前缀的无标签 Issue
+   c. `--action blocked-check` — 检查 blocked Issue，若阻塞已解除则自动移除 blocked 标签
+   d. 都无则分析无标签、无标识的 Issue，判断是否在 QE 域内
+   e. 同时检查 `--labels acceptance-failure`
+5. 有 Issue → 走完整闭环处理（Step 2-8）
+   - 关闭 Issue 时自动解除被该 Issue 阻塞的其他 Issue（移除 blocked 标签）
+6. 无 Issue → 简短报告 "main healthy"，等待下次轮询
 7. 同时保持对话开放，随时响应用户指令

 这样 QE-Agent 真正做到 **"默认轮询 + 随时互动"**。
@@ -41,19 +47,36 @@ GITEA_API_TOKEN 需要 `write:issue`、`write:repository`、`write:user` 权限

 验证环境：
 ```bash
-python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-dev
+python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-code
 ```

 ## 工作流程

 ### Step 1: 轮询待处理 Issue

+**第一轮：捡带标签的 Issue**
 ```bash
-python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-dev
+python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-code
 ```

-如果有输出（如 `#5 [test-dev] 添加海外策略IR覆盖率测试`），说明有待处理的测试开发任务。
-如果无输出，报告"当前没有待处理的 test-dev issue"。
+如果有输出（如 `#5 [test-code] 添加海外策略IR覆盖率测试`），说明有待处理的测试开发任务。
+如果无输出，进入第二轮。
+
+**第二轮：捡无标签但 title 带前缀的 Issue**
+```bash
+python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list
+```
+从输出中筛选 title 以 `[test]` 开头的无标签 Issue。
+
+**第三轮：分析无标识 Issue**
+如果以上两轮都无结果，分析所有无标签、无 title 标识的 Issue，判断是否属于 QE 域。
+
+**blocked Issue 处理**：
+- 不要直接跳过 `blocked` 标签的 Issue
+- 运行 `--action blocked-check` 检查阻塞状态是否已解除
+- 如果所有阻塞 Issue 已关闭 → blocked 标签自动移除 → 正常处理
+- 如果仍有未解决的阻塞 → 跳过，等待阻塞解除
+- 关闭 Issue 时会自动检查并解除被其阻塞的 Issue（auto-unblock）

 同时检查 `acceptance-failure` 标签的 issue：
 ```bash
@@ -128,18 +151,18 @@ python -m pytest tests/acceptance/ -v --run-acceptance -k "not test_layer_c_qe_a
 测试必须全部通过（至少 Layer A 和 Layer B），才能提交。

 **Issue 关闭规则**：
- QE 测试通过 → 关闭 test-dev issue
- QE 测试失败 + 发现新问题 → 开 dev issue (agent-task 标签)，**test-dev issue 保持 open**，评论 `阻塞: #<dev-issue>`
- QE 测试失败 + dev issue 已存在 → test-dev issue **保持 open**，更新 dev issue
- Dev issue 修复 + e2e 重新通过 → 关闭 test-dev issue
- **绝不**在问题未修复时关闭 test-dev issue
+- QE 测试通过 → 关闭 test-code issue
+- QE 测试失败 + 发现新问题 → 开 dev issue (agent-task 标签)，**test-code issue 保持 open**，评论 `阻塞: #<dev-issue>`
+- QE 测试失败 + dev issue 已存在 → test-code issue **保持 open**，更新 dev issue
+- Dev issue 修复 + e2e 重新通过 → 关闭 test-code issue
+- **绝不**在问题未修复时关闭 test-code issue

 **Issue 重开规则**：
 - Dev issue 被关闭但 QE 重验仍失败 → **重开 dev issue**，加 `## REOPEN 原因` 评论：
  1. 已修复项（肯定进展）
  2. 仍存在的问题（具体数据 + 阈值对比）
  3. 结论：为什么修复不完整
- 重开后同步更新关联 test-dev issue
+- 重开后同步更新关联 test-code issue

 ### Step 4: 提交并推送

@@ -202,7 +225,7 @@ python scripts/agent_poller.py --action lifecycle --issue <N>
 ### 完整闭环图

 ```
-Gitea "test-dev" Issue
+Gitea "test-code" Issue
    │
    ▼
 QE-Agent 领取 (step 1-2)
@@ -233,6 +256,23 @@ QE-Agent 领取 (step 1-2)
    └── 分析新 issue ─────────┘
 ```

+## Issue 创建规则
+
+创建 Issue 时，必须指定 label 以明确 Issue 归属：
+
+- **测试代码 Issue** → `test-code` label（QE-Agent 域）
+  ```bash
+  python scripts/agent_poller.py --action create-issue \
+    --title "[test] issue 标题" --labels test-code --body "..."
+  ```
+- **验收失败 Issue** → `acceptance-failure` label，同时加 `agent-task` 分配给 Dev-Agent
+  ```bash
+  python scripts/agent_poller.py --action create-issue \
+    --title "acceptance failure: ..." --labels "acceptance-failure,agent-task" --body "..."
+  ```
+- **产品/功能 Issue** → `product-code` label（Dev-Agent 域），一般由 Dev-Agent 自行创建
+- 多个 label 用逗号分隔，如 `--labels "acceptance-failure,agent-task"`
+
 ## 测试开发指南

 ### 添加新的 Schema 检查
@@ -263,12 +303,13 @@ QE-Agent 领取 (step 1-2)

 ## 关键约束

-1. **只修改 `tests/acceptance/`** — 不碰应用代码、不碰 `skills/`、不碰 `scripts/`（除非是修复 agent_poller 或 create_failure_issue）
-2. **不碰 `tests/unit/`、`tests/integration/`** — 那是开发团队维护的
-3. **每次只处理一个 issue** — 不混入多个 issue 的改动
-4. **`Closes #<N>` 必须出现在 commit message 中**
-5. **本地验证必须通过再 push** — 至少 Layer A + Layer B
-6. **如果 Layer C（QE Audit）需要验证但 API 不可用** — 在 issue 下评论注明，标记 `--run-acceptance` 通过后 merge
+1. **任何对 git 管理内容的修改必须走完整流程**：开 Issue → 改动 → 提交 PR → CI 通过 → merge → close Issue。无论是自主轮询还是与用户互动触发的改动，一律遵守此规则。绝不直接改文件而不走 Issue 流程。
+2. **只修改 `tests/acceptance/`** — 不碰应用代码、不碰 `skills/`、不碰 `scripts/`（除非是修复 agent_poller 或 create_failure_issue）
+3. **不碰 `tests/unit/`、`tests/integration/`** — 那是开发团队维护的
+4. **每次只处理一个 issue** — 不混入多个 issue 的改动
+5. **`Closes #<N>` 必须出现在 commit message 中**
+6. **本地验证必须通过再 push** — 至少 Layer A + Layer B
+7. **如果 Layer C（QE Audit）需要验证但 API 不可用** — 在 issue 下评论注明，标记 `--run-acceptance` 通过后 merge

 ## Session 收尾

@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html lang="zh-CN">
+<head>
+<meta charset="UTF-8">
+<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
+<title>QE-Agent Workflow</title>
+<style>
+  :root { --bg:#0d1117; --card:#161b22; --border:#30363d; --text:#c9d1d9;
+          --green:#3fb950; --red:#f85149; --yellow:#d2991d; --blue:#58a6ff; --purple:#bc8cff; }
+  * { box-sizing:border-box; margin:0; padding:0; }
+  body { background:var(--bg); color:var(--text); font:14px/1.6 -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,sans-serif; max-width:960px; margin:0 auto; padding:24px; }
+  h1 { font-size:24px; border-bottom:1px solid var(--border); padding-bottom:12px; margin-bottom:24px; }
+  h2 { font-size:18px; margin-top:32px; margin-bottom:12px; color:var(--blue); }
+  h3 { font-size:15px; margin-top:20px; margin-bottom:8px; }
+  .card { background:var(--card); border:1px solid var(--border); border-radius:8px; padding:16px; margin:12px 0; }
+  .flow { display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:8px; align-items:center; margin:16px 0; font-size:13px; }
+  .flow .step { background:var(--card); border:1px solid var(--border); border-radius:6px; padding:8px 14px; white-space:nowrap; }
+  .flow .arrow { color:var(--blue); font-weight:bold; }
+  .pass { color:var(--green); }
+  .fail { color:var(--red); }
+  .warn { color:var(--yellow); }
+  table { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; margin:12px 0; font-size:13px; }
+  th, td { border:1px solid var(--border); padding:8px 12px; text-align:left; }
+  th { background:var(--card); }
+  code { background:var(--card); padding:2px 6px; border-radius:4px; font-size:13px; }
+  pre { background:var(--card); border:1px solid var(--border); border-radius:6px; padding:12px; overflow-x:auto; font-size:13px; }
+  ul, ol { padding-left:24px; margin:8px 0; }
+  li { margin:4px 0; }
+  .badge { display:inline-block; padding:2px 8px; border-radius:12px; font-size:12px; font-weight:600; }
+  .badge-qe { background:var(--purple); color:#fff; }
+  .badge-dev { background:var(--blue); color:#fff; }
+  .badge-pass { background:var(--green); color:#000; }
+  .badge-fail { background:var(--red); color:#fff; }
+</style>
+</head>
+<body>
+
+<h1>QE-Agent Workflow</h1>
+
+<p>QE-Agent 是一个自动化质量工程代理，专注于 <strong>main branch 的发布质量</strong>。
+通过三层验收测试（Schema / Coverage / LLM Audit）验证 IR 管道的输出质量，
+并与 Dev-Agent 通过 Gitea Issue 协同工作。</p>
+
+<div class="card">
+  <strong>启动方式</strong><br>
+  <code>bash scripts/start_qe_agent.sh</code> — 三种模式：单次 / 持续轮询 / 交互<br>
+  <code>claude --agent agents/QE_AGENT.md</code> — 直接启动交互模式（默认 /loop 10m 轮询）
+</div>
+
+<h2>1. 角色与边界</h2>
+
+<table>
+  <tr><th></th><th><span class="badge badge-qe">QE-Agent</span></th><th><span class="badge badge-dev">Dev-Agent</span></th></tr>
+  <tr><td>关注范围</td><td>main branch 健康</td><td>功能开发与 bug 修复</td></tr>
+  <tr><td>代码</td><td><code>tests/acceptance/</code></td><td><code>skills/</code> <code>scripts/</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>测试</td><td>验收测试 (三层)</td><td>UT/IT</td></tr>
+  <tr><td>分支</td><td><code>test/issue-N</code></td><td><code>dev/issue-N-*</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>Commit</td><td><code>test: ... - Closes #N</code></td><td><code>fix: ... - Closes #N</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>签名</td><td><code>[qe-agent: qa-01]</code></td><td><code>[da-01]</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>Issue 标签</td><td><code>test-code</code></td><td><code>agent-task</code> <code>ci-failure</code></td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<h2>2. 三层验收测试</h2>
+
+<div class="flow">
+  <div class="step">Layer A<br><strong>Schema</strong><br>确定性验证</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">Layer B<br><strong>Coverage</strong><br>结构溯源覆盖率</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">Layer C<br><strong>QE Audit</strong><br>LLM 专家审计</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step"><strong>Report</strong><br>JSON 报告</div>
+</div>
+
+<table>
+  <tr><th>Layer</th><th>方法</th><th>阈值</th><th>LLM</th></tr>
+  <tr><td>A — Schema</td><td>IR 结构验证 (rule_id / trigger / sources / actions)</td><td>0 errors</td><td>不需要</td></tr>
+  <tr><td>B — Coverage</td><td>IR sources[] 对文档内容单元的引用率</td><td>≥ 70%</td><td>不需要</td></tr>
+  <tr><td>C — QE Audit</td><td>LLM 逐章节评估 IR 覆盖充分性</td><td>inadequate ≤ 30%</td><td>deepseek-v4-flash</td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<div class="card">
+  <strong>最终判决</strong>: 三层全部 PASS → <span class="pass">releasable ✓</span> | 任意一层 FAIL → <span class="fail">blocked ✗</span>
+</div>
+
+<h2>3. Issue 工作流</h2>
+
+<h3>3.1 轮询</h3>
+<pre>python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-code
+python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels acceptance-failure</pre>
+
+<h3>3.2 test-code Issue 闭环</h3>
+<div class="flow">
+  <div class="step">1. 领取<br>comment</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">2. 开发<br>tests/acceptance/</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">3. 本地验证<br>pytest</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">4. 提交<br>test/issue-N</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">5. PR + CI</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">6. merge</div>
+  <div class="arrow">→</div>
+  <div class="step">7. close</div>
+</div>
+
+<h3>3.3 e2e 验证流程</h3>
+<ol>
+  <li>识别 dev-agent 修复完毕（关联 dev issue 已关闭）</li>
+  <li><code>git pull origin main</code></li>
+  <li><code>python scripts/run_pipeline.py --parsed &lt;path&gt; --test</code></li>
+  <li>分析三层报告</li>
+  <li>全部 PASS → 关闭 test-code issue</li>
+  <li>仍有 FAIL → 重开 dev issue + 更新 test-code issue</li>
+</ol>
+
+<h2>4. Issue 生命周期规则</h2>
+
+<div class="card">
+<h3>关闭规则</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li>QE 测试通过 → 关闭 test-code issue</li>
+  <li>QE 测试失败 + 新问题 → 开 dev issue (agent-task)，test-code <strong>保持 open</strong></li>
+  <li>QE 测试失败 + dev issue 已存在 → test-code <strong>保持 open</strong></li>
+  <li><strong>绝不</strong>在问题未修复时关闭 test-code issue</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+
+<div class="card">
+<h3>重开规则</h3>
+<ul>
+  <li>Dev issue 被关但 QE 重验仍失败 → <strong>重开 dev issue</strong></li>
+  <li>必须加 <code>## REOPEN by [qe-agent: qa-01]</code> 评论，包含：<ol>
+    <li>已修复项（肯定进展）</li>
+    <li>仍存在的问题（具体数据 + 阈值对比）</li>
+    <li>结论：为什么修复不完整</li>
+  </ol></li>
+  <li>重开后同步更新关联 test-code issue</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+
+<h2>5. Agent 间通信协议</h2>
+
+<div class="card">
+<p><strong>Issue 状态是唯一通信渠道</strong>。两个 agent 共用 <code>pzhang_zywl</code> Gitea 账号，通过签名区分：</p>
+<ul>
+  <li><span class="badge badge-qe">QE</span> 评论末尾: <code>[qe-agent: qa-01]</code></li>
+  <li><span class="badge badge-dev">Dev</span> 评论末尾: <code>[da-01]</code></li>
+</ul>
+<p><strong>QE → Dev</strong>: 发现问题 → 开 dev issue (agent-task) / 重开已有 dev issue</p>
+<p><strong>Dev → QE</strong>: 修复完成 → 关闭 dev issue（自验证后）</p>
+<p><strong>QE 验收</strong>: 拉取 main → 重跑 e2e → 通过就关 test-code，不通过就重开 dev issue</p>
+</div>
+
+<h2>6. 命令速查</h2>
+
+<table>
+  <tr><th>操作</th><th>命令</th></tr>
+  <tr><td>轮询 issue</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-code</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>查看 issue</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action get --issue &lt;N&gt;</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>评论</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action comment --issue &lt;N&gt; --body "..."</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>生命周期</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action lifecycle --issue &lt;N&gt;</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>创建 PR</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action create-pr --issue &lt;N&gt; --branch test/issue-&lt;N&gt;</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>查 PR CI</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action pr-status --pr &lt;N&gt;</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>合并 PR</td><td><code>agent_poller.py --action merge-pr --pr &lt;N&gt;</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>跑管道</td><td><code>python scripts/run_pipeline.py --parsed &lt;path&gt; --test</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>验收测试</td><td><code>pytest tests/acceptance/ -v --run-acceptance</code></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>仅 Layer A+B</td><td><code>pytest tests/acceptance/ -v --run-acceptance -k "not test_layer_c"</code></td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<h2>7. 文件结构</h2>
+
+<pre>
+tests/acceptance/
+├── conftest.py              # Pytest 配置、fixtures、LLM client
+├── ir_schema.py             # IR schema 验证
+├── report.py                # 三层 JSON 报告
+└── test_main_health.py      # Layer A → B → C
+
+scripts/
+├── agent_poller.py          # Gitea API 工具
+├── run_pipeline.py          # 端到端管道运行器
+├── start_qe_agent.sh        # QE-Agent 启动脚本
+└── .env                     # Token 配置 (gitignored)
+
+agents/
+├── QE_AGENT.md              # QE-Agent 系统指令
+└── DEV_AGENT.md             # Dev-Agent 系统指令
+
+.gitea/workflows/
+├── ci.yml                   # CI (push/PR)
+└── acceptance.yml           # 手动触发验收
+</pre>
+
+<h2>8. 本 Session 处理记录</h2>
+
+<table>
+  <tr><th>Issue</th><th>内容</th><th>结果</th></tr>
+  <tr><td>#10</td><td>移除硬编码路径，适配 config.py</td><td><span class="pass">closed</span></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>#12</td><td>实现端到端验收测试流程</td><td><span class="pass">closed</span></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>#14</td><td>跑完整 e2e 测试</td><td><span class="pass">closed</span></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>#15</td><td>Dev: IR rules=[] (多次 reopen)</td><td><span class="pass">closed</span></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>#18</td><td>再跑 e2e 测试</td><td><span class="warn">open</span></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>#21</td><td>P0: 覆盖率不足 (多次 reopen)</td><td><span class="fail">reopened</span></td></tr>
+  <tr><td>#22</td><td>P1: trigger.operator 为空</td><td><span class="pass">closed</span></td></tr>
+</table>
+
+<p style="margin-top:24px;color:var(--border);font-size:12px;">QE-Agent [qe-agent: qa-01] — document_analyzer project</p>
+
+</body>
+</html>
@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@

 Usage:
    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list
-    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-dev
+    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-code
    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action get --issue 1
    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action comment --issue 1 --body "Working on this"
+    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action create-issue --title "My issue" --labels test-code --body "..."
    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action create-pr --issue 1 --branch test/issue-1
    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action pr-status --pr 4
    python scripts/agent_poller.py --action merge-pr --pr 4
@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ Usage:
 import argparse
 import json
 import os
+import re
 import sys
 import urllib.request
 import urllib.error
@@ -54,6 +56,27 @@ def _req(method, path, data=None):
        sys.exit(1)


+def _req_safe(method, path, data=None):
+    """Like _req but returns None on HTTPError instead of crashing.
+    Used for probing issue/PR existence where the caller can handle absence.
+    """
+    url = f"{BASE}{path}"
+    payload = json.dumps(data).encode("utf-8") if data else None
+    req = urllib.request.Request(url, data=payload, method=method)
+    req.add_header("Authorization", f"token {GITEA_TOKEN}")
+    req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
+    try:
+        with urllib.request.urlopen(req) as resp:
+            raw = resp.read()
+            if not raw:
+                return {}
+            return json.loads(raw)
+    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
+        body = e.read().decode()
+        print(f"API Error {e.code}: {body}", file=sys.stderr)
+        return None
+
+
 # ── Issue operations ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 def list_issues(labels: list[str] | None = None):
@@ -72,6 +95,68 @@ def list_issues(labels: list[str] | None = None):
    return issues


+def _get_blocking_refs(issue_num: int) -> set[int]:
+    """Extract all issue references from an issue body + comments.
+
+    Scans both the issue body and all comments for #N patterns,
+    returning a set of referenced issue numbers.
+    """
+    refs: set[int] = set()
+    # Body
+    issue = _req_safe("GET", f"/issues/{issue_num}")
+    if issue is None:
+        return refs  # API error → return empty set, keep blocked
+    body = issue.get("body", "") or ""
+    refs.update(int(m.group(1)) for m in re.finditer(r'#(\d+)', body))
+    # Comments
+    comments = _req_safe("GET", f"/issues/{issue_num}/comments")
+    if comments:
+        for c in comments:
+            cbody = c.get("body", "") or ""
+            refs.update(int(m.group(1)) for m in re.finditer(r'#(\d+)', cbody))
+    return refs
+
+
+def blocked_check():
+    """Check all blocked issues: if blocking issues are now closed, unblock.
+
+    Scans issue body + comments for blocking references.
+    If no references found or all referenced issues are closed,
+    removes the 'blocked' label.
+    """
+    all_blocked = _req_safe("GET", "/issues?state=open&labels=blocked")
+    if not all_blocked:
+        print("No blocked issues found.")
+        return
+
+    unblocked_count = 0
+    for issue in all_blocked:
+        blocking_nums = _get_blocking_refs(issue["number"])
+
+        all_resolved = True
+        for blk in blocking_nums:
+            blk_issue = _req_safe("GET", f"/issues/{blk}")
+            if blk_issue is None:
+                all_resolved = False  # API error → keep blocked
+                break
+            if blk_issue.get("state") != "closed":
+                all_resolved = False
+                break
+
+        if all_resolved:
+            current_label_names = [l["name"] for l in issue.get("labels", [])]
+            new_label_names = [l for l in current_label_names if l != "blocked"]
+            new_label_ids = _label_names_to_ids(new_label_names)
+            _req("PUT", f"/issues/{issue['number']}/labels", {"labels": new_label_ids})
+            reason = "所有阻塞 Issue 均已关闭" if blocking_nums else "无阻塞引用，移除残留 blocked 标签"
+            print(f"Unblocked #{issue['number']}: {issue['title']}")
+            comment_issue(issue["number"], f"阻塞已解除：{reason}。")
+            unblocked_count += 1
+
+    if unblocked_count == 0:
+        print(f"Checked {len(all_blocked)} blocked issue(s): still blocked.")
+
+
 def get_issue(num):
    i = _req("GET", f"/issues/{num}")
    print(f"## #{i['number']}: {i['title']}")
@@ -90,14 +175,108 @@ def comment_issue(num, body):


 def close_issue(num, body=None):
-    """Close an issue, optionally with a final comment (signature auto-appended)."""
+    """Close an issue, optionally with a final comment (signature auto-appended).
+
+    After closing, automatically unblocks any issues that were blocked by this one
+    if no other blocking issues remain open.
+    """
    if body:
        comment_issue(num, body)  # comment_issue already appends AGENT_SIG
    i = _req("PATCH", f"/issues/{num}", {"state": "closed"})
    print(f"Issue #{num} closed")
+    _unblock_issues_blocked_by(num)
    return i


+def reopen_issue(num, body=None):
+    """Reopen a closed issue, optionally with a reason comment."""
+    if body:
+        comment_issue(num, f"## REOPEN\n\n{body}")
+    i = _req("PATCH", f"/issues/{num}", {"state": "open"})
+    print(f"Issue #{num} reopened")
+    return i
+
+
+def _unblock_issues_blocked_by(closed_num):
+    """Check issues blocked by *closed_num* and unblock if all blockers resolved.
+
+    Scans both body and comments for #N references. If *closed_num* appears
+    in any blocked issue and all referenced issues are now closed,
+    removes the 'blocked' label and comments on the unblocked issue.
+    """
+    all_blocked = _req_safe("GET", "/issues?state=open&labels=blocked")
+    if not all_blocked:
+        return
+
+    for issue in all_blocked:
+        blocking_nums = _get_blocking_refs(issue["number"])
+        if closed_num not in blocking_nums:
+            continue
+
+        # Check all referenced issues — are they all closed?
+        all_resolved = True
+        for blk in blocking_nums:
+            if blk == closed_num:
+                continue
+            blk_issue = _req_safe("GET", f"/issues/{blk}")
+            if blk_issue is None:
+                all_resolved = False  # API error → keep blocked
+                break
+            if blk_issue.get("state") != "closed":
+                all_resolved = False
+                break
+
+        if all_resolved:
+            current_label_names = [l["name"] for l in issue.get("labels", [])]
+            new_label_names = [l for l in current_label_names if l != "blocked"]
+            new_label_ids = _label_names_to_ids(new_label_names)
+            _req("PUT", f"/issues/{issue['number']}/labels", {"labels": new_label_ids})
+            print(f"  -> Unblocked #{issue['number']}: all blocking issues resolved")
+            comment_issue(issue["number"],
+                f"阻塞已解除：#{closed_num} 及其他阻塞 Issue 均已关闭。")
+
+
+def create_issue(title, body=None, labels=None):
+    """Create a new Gitea issue.
+
+    Labels convention (per project rules):
+      - Product/feature issues → product-code
+      - Test code issues → test-code
+    """
+    payload = {"title": title}
+    if body:
+        payload["body"] = body + AGENT_SIG
+    if labels:
+        label_names = [l.strip() for l in labels.split(",") if l.strip()]
+        # Gitea 1.22 expects label IDs (int64). Resolve names → IDs.
+        label_ids = _label_names_to_ids(label_names)
+        if label_ids:
+            payload["labels"] = label_ids
+    i = _req("POST", "/issues", payload)
+    issue_labels = [l["name"] for l in i.get("labels", [])]
+    print(f"Issue #{i['number']} created: {i['title']}")
+    if issue_labels:
+        print(f"Labels: {', '.join(issue_labels)}")
+    print(f"URL: {i.get('html_url', i.get('url', ''))}")
+    return i
+
+
+def _label_names_to_ids(names: list[str]) -> list[int]:
+    """Resolve label names to Gitea label IDs. Returns empty list on failure."""
+    try:
+        all_labels = _req("GET", "/labels")
+        name_to_id = {l["name"]: l["id"] for l in all_labels}
+        ids = []
+        for name in names:
+            if name in name_to_id:
+                ids.append(name_to_id[name])
+            else:
+                print(f"Warning: label '{name}' not found, skipping", file=sys.stderr)
+        return ids
+    except SystemExit:
+        return []
+
+
 # ── PR operations ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 def create_pr(issue_num, branch, body=None):
@@ -212,12 +391,15 @@ def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Dev agent Gitea helper")
    parser.add_argument("--action", required=True,
                        choices=["list", "get", "comment", "close-issue",
-                                 "create-pr", "pr-status", "merge-pr", "lifecycle"])
+                                 "create-issue", "reopen-issue",
+                                 "create-pr", "pr-status", "merge-pr", "lifecycle",
+                                 "blocked-check"])
    parser.add_argument("--issue", type=int)
    parser.add_argument("--pr", type=int)
+    parser.add_argument("--title", help="Issue title (for 'create-issue' action)")
    parser.add_argument("--branch")
    parser.add_argument("--body")
-    parser.add_argument("--labels", help="Comma-separated labels to filter issues (for 'list' action)")
+    parser.add_argument("--labels", help="Comma-separated labels (filter for 'list', assign for 'create-issue')")
    args = parser.parse_args()

    if not GITEA_TOKEN:
@@ -243,6 +425,16 @@ def main():
            print("--issue is required for 'close-issue' action", file=sys.stderr)
            sys.exit(1)
        close_issue(args.issue, args.body)
+    elif args.action == "create-issue":
+        if not args.title:
+            print("--title is required for 'create-issue' action", file=sys.stderr)
+            sys.exit(1)
+        create_issue(args.title, args.body, args.labels)
+    elif args.action == "reopen-issue":
+        if not args.issue:
+            print("--issue is required for 'reopen-issue' action", file=sys.stderr)
+            sys.exit(1)
+        reopen_issue(args.issue, args.body)
    elif args.action == "create-pr":
        if not args.issue or not args.branch:
            print("--issue and --branch are required for 'create-pr' action", file=sys.stderr)
@@ -258,6 +450,8 @@ def main():
            print("--pr is required for 'merge-pr' action", file=sys.stderr)
            sys.exit(1)
        merge_pr(args.pr)
+    elif args.action == "blocked-check":
+        blocked_check()
    elif args.action == "lifecycle":
        if not args.issue:
            print("--issue is required for 'lifecycle' action", file=sys.stderr)
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ launch_agent \
    "agents/QE_AGENT.md" \
    "QE-Agent" \
    "执行一次 Issue 巡检（单次任务，不要用 /loop）：
-1. python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-dev 检查 test-dev Issue
+1. python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels test-code 检查 test-code Issue
 2. python scripts/agent_poller.py --action list --labels acceptance-failure 检查 acceptance-failure Issue
-3. test-dev Issue：分析 → 开发验收测试到 tests/acceptance/ → pytest 本地验证 → commit('test:' 前缀, Closes #N) → push → create-pr → 等 CI → merge-pr
-4. acceptance-failure Issue：分析失败原因 → 测试问题则修复测试 → 管道问题则开 test-dev issue 跟踪
+3. test-code Issue：分析 → 开发验收测试到 tests/acceptance/ → pytest 本地验证 → commit('test:' 前缀, Closes #N) → push → create-pr → 等 CI → merge-pr
+4. acceptance-failure Issue：分析失败原因 → 测试问题则修复测试 → 管道问题则开 test-code issue 跟踪
 5. 所有 Issue 处理完毕后报告汇总并退出。" \
-    "现在开始工作。使用 /loop 10m 开启轮询：每 10 分钟检查 test-dev 和 acceptance-failure 标签 Issue，有则走完整闭环（分析→开发测试→pytest→push→PR→CI→merge），无则报告 main healthy。保持对话开放。"
+    "现在开始工作。使用 /loop 10m 开启轮询：每 10 分钟检查 test-code 和 acceptance-failure 标签 Issue，有则走完整闭环（分析→开发测试→pytest→push→PR→CI→merge），无则报告 main healthy。保持对话开放。"
@@ -880,11 +880,19 @@ def run_ensemble_semantic_index(doc: dict) -> dict:
            if v:
                print(f"    {k}: {len(v)} 个问题")

-        # Feedback retry: re-run with coverage feedback (one retry)
+        # Feedback retry: re-run with coverage feedback (up to 2 retries, quality-gated)
+        retry_count = 0
+        while retry_count < 2:
            feedback = _build_coverage_feedback(gaps)
-        if feedback:
-            print(f"\n  覆盖反馈重试 (feedback长度={len(feedback)}字符)...", flush=True)
+            if not feedback:
+                break
+            retry_count += 1
+            print(f"\n  覆盖反馈重试 #{retry_count} (feedback长度={len(feedback)}字符)...", flush=True)
            try:
+                # record pre-retry coverage to gate quality
+                pre_warnings = len(gaps.get("coverage_warnings", []))
+                pre_missing_rows = len(gaps.get("missing_table_rows", []))
+
                retry_prompt = build_prompt(doc, feedback, all_paths)
                print(f"  重试 prompt 长度: {len(retry_prompt)} 字符", flush=True)
                retry_result = call_llm(retry_prompt, max_retries=1, temperature=0.3)
@@ -892,27 +900,39 @@ def run_ensemble_semantic_index(doc: dict) -> dict:
                n_retry_concepts = len(retry_result.get("concepts", []))
                print(f"  重试返回: {n_retry_concepts} 概念, {n_retry_units} 功能单元", flush=True)
                if n_retry_units > 0:
-                    # Check which new sections were covered
                    retry_sections = set()
                    for fu in retry_result.get("function_units", []):
                        for src in fu.get("sources", []):
                            if src.get("section"):
                                retry_sections.add(src["section"])
                    print(f"  重试新增 sections: {sorted(retry_sections)}", flush=True)
-                    # Merge retry into results and re-validate
+                    # Quality gate: only include retry if it improves coverage
+                    trial_indices = semantic_indices + [retry_result]
+                    trial_merged = ensemble_merge(trial_indices)
+                    trial_passed, trial_gaps = _quick_validate(trial_merged, doc, all_paths)
+                    trial_warnings = len(trial_gaps.get("coverage_warnings", []))
+                    trial_missing = len(trial_gaps.get("missing_table_rows", []))
+                    if trial_warnings < pre_warnings or trial_missing < pre_missing_rows:
                        semantic_indices.append(retry_result)
-                    merged = ensemble_merge(semantic_indices)
-                    merged["ensemble_temperatures"] = list(temperatures) + ["feedback_retry"]
-                    passed, gaps = _quick_validate(merged, doc, all_paths)
+                        merged = trial_merged
+                        passed, gaps = trial_passed, trial_gaps
+                        merged["ensemble_temperatures"] = list(temperatures) + [f"feedback_retry_{retry_count}"]
                        merged["validation_passed"] = passed
                        merged["validation_gaps"] = {
                            k: v for k, v in gaps.items() if v
                        }
-                    print(f"  重试后验证: {'PASS' if passed else 'GAPS FOUND'}", flush=True)
+                        print(f"  重试后验证 (已采纳): {'PASS' if passed else 'GAPS FOUND'} "
+                              f"(warnings {pre_warnings}→{trial_warnings}, "
+                              f"missing_rows {pre_missing_rows}→{trial_missing})", flush=True)
+                    else:
+                        print(f"  重试结果未提升覆盖率，丢弃 "
+                              f"(warnings {pre_warnings}→{trial_warnings}, "
+                              f"missing_rows {pre_missing_rows}→{trial_missing})", flush=True)
            except Exception as e:
                print(f"  覆盖反馈重试失败: {e}", flush=True)
                import traceback
                traceback.print_exc()
+                break

    return merged

@@ -169,6 +169,34 @@ def _normalize_rule(rule: dict) -> dict:
            "value": "active"
        }]

+    # Ensure table/text sources have a section field (defensive against LLM omission)
+    # Also normalize invalid source types (LLM hallucinations like function_unit_description)
+    sources = rule.get("sources", [])
+    if sources:
+        valid_types = {"table", "text", "logic_tree"}
+
+        # try to infer a default section from sibling sources or the rule path
+        default_section = ""
+        for s in sources:
+            sec = s.get("section", "")
+            if sec and sec.strip():
+                default_section = sec.strip()
+                break
+        if not default_section:
+            path = rule.get("path", "")
+            if path:
+                default_section = path.split(" > ")[0] if " > " in path else path
+
+        for src in sources:
+            stype = src.get("type", "")
+            # Normalize invalid source types to "text"
+            if stype and stype not in valid_types:
+                src["type"] = "text"
+                stype = "text"
+            if stype in ("table", "text"):
+                if not src.get("section"):
+                    src["section"] = default_section
+
    return rule


@@ -465,3 +465,64 @@ class TestNormalizeRule:
        normalized = _normalize_rule(rule)
        assert normalized["trigger"]["operator"] == "AND"
        assert normalized["trigger"]["conditions"][0]["operator"] == ">="
+
+    def test_normalize_source_missing_section_from_sibling(self):
+        """Table/text sources without section get it from sibling sources."""
+        rule = {
+            "trigger": {"conditions": [{"signal": "x", "operator": "==", "value": "1"}]},
+            "sources": [
+                {"type": "table", "section": "3.1.1 系统限制", "row": 1},
+                {"type": "text", "text_snippet": "missing section"},
+            ],
+        }
+        normalized = _normalize_rule(rule)
+        assert normalized["sources"][1]["section"] == "3.1.1 系统限制"
+
+    def test_normalize_source_missing_section_from_path(self):
+        """Table/text sources without section and no sibling fall back to rule path."""
+        rule = {
+            "trigger": {"conditions": [{"signal": "x", "operator": "==", "value": "1"}]},
+            "path": "4.2 关闭流程 > decision_speed > action_disable",
+            "sources": [
+                {"type": "table", "row": 3, "text_snippet": "no section anywhere"},
+            ],
+        }
+        normalized = _normalize_rule(rule)
+        assert normalized["sources"][0]["section"] == "4.2 关闭流程"
+
+    def test_normalize_source_keeps_existing_section(self):
+        """Sources that already have section are not modified."""
+        rule = {
+            "trigger": {"conditions": [{"signal": "x", "operator": "==", "value": "1"}]},
+            "sources": [
+                {"type": "table", "section": "1.0 概述", "row": 1},
+            ],
+        }
+        normalized = _normalize_rule(rule)
+        assert normalized["sources"][0]["section"] == "1.0 概述"
+
+    def test_normalize_source_skips_logic_tree(self):
+        """Logic tree sources are not touched (don't need section)."""
+        rule = {
+            "trigger": {"conditions": [{"signal": "x", "operator": "==", "value": "1"}]},
+            "sources": [
+                {"type": "logic_tree", "image_id": "img1", "node_ids": ["n1"]},
+            ],
+        }
+        normalized = _normalize_rule(rule)
+        assert "section" not in normalized["sources"][0]
+
+    def test_normalize_source_invalid_type(self):
+        """Invalid source types (LLM hallucinations) are normalized to text."""
+        rule = {
+            "trigger": {"conditions": [{"signal": "x", "operator": "==", "value": "1"}]},
+            "sources": [
+                {"type": "function_unit_description", "text_snippet": "desc",
+                 "section": "3.1 功能"},
+                {"type": "unknown_type", "text_snippet": "also invalid"},
+            ],
+        }
+        normalized = _normalize_rule(rule)
+        assert normalized["sources"][0]["type"] == "text"
+        assert normalized["sources"][1]["type"] == "text"
+        assert normalized["sources"][0]["section"] == "3.1 功能"
@@ -291,6 +291,85 @@ def _measure_coverage(ir_data: dict, parsed_data: dict) -> dict:
    }


+def test_measure_coverage_excludes_zero_dimensions():
+    """#36: dimensions with total=0 must not drag down the overall rate.
+
+    When diagram total=0, the overall should be computed from sections and tables
+    only, not include a 0% diagram entry that makes the goal unreachable.
+    """
+    parsed_data = {
+        "sections": [
+            {"source": "3.1.1 功能A", "blocks": [
+                {"type": "table", "rows": [{"cell": "1"}, {"cell": "2"}]}
+            ]}
+        ],
+        "image_analysis": [],  # no diagrams → total=0
+    }
+    # IR that covers the section but no table rows (table coverage = 0/2)
+    ir_data = {
+        "rules": [
+            {"sources": [{"section": "3.1.1"}]}  # 1 section covered, 0 tables
+        ]
+    }
+
+    cov = _measure_coverage(ir_data, parsed_data)
+
+    # Section: 1/1 = 100%, Table: 0/2 = 0%, Diagram: total=0 → excluded
+    assert cov["section_coverage"]["total"] == 1
+    assert cov["section_coverage"]["rate"] == 1.0
+    assert cov["table_coverage"]["total_rows"] == 2
+    assert cov["table_coverage"]["rate"] == 0.0
+    assert cov["diagram_coverage"]["total"] == 0
+    assert cov["diagram_coverage"]["rate"] == 1.0  # _safe_rate: 0/0 → 1.0
+
+    # Key assertion: diagram (total=0) is excluded from overall
+    # overall = (1.0 + 0.0) / 2 = 0.5
+    # NOT (1.0 + 0.0 + 1.0) / 3 = 0.667
+    assert cov["overall_rate"] == 0.5, (
+        f"Expected overall 0.5 (sections + tables only), got {cov['overall_rate']}. "
+        f"Zero-content dimension may be leaking into the average."
+    )
+
+
+def test_measure_coverage_all_dimensions_have_content():
+    """When all dimensions have content, all should be included."""
+    parsed_data = {
+        "sections": [
+            {"source": "3.1.1 功能A", "blocks": [
+                {"type": "table", "rows": [{"cell": "1"}]}
+            ]}
+        ],
+        "image_analysis": [{"type": "flowchart", "rid": "img_001"}],
+    }
+    ir_data = {
+        "rules": [
+            {"sources": [{"section": "3.1.1"}]},
+            {"sources": [{"type": "table", "section": "3.1.1", "row": 0}]},
+            {"sources": [{"type": "logic_tree", "image_id": "img_001"}]},
+        ]
+    }
+
+    cov = _measure_coverage(ir_data, parsed_data)
+
+    # All three dimensions have content → all included
+    assert cov["section_coverage"]["total"] == 1
+    assert cov["table_coverage"]["total_rows"] == 1
+    assert cov["diagram_coverage"]["total"] == 1
+    # overall = (1.0 + 1.0 + 1.0) / 3 = 1.0
+    assert cov["overall_rate"] == 1.0, (
+        f"Expected overall 1.0 (all covered), got {cov['overall_rate']}"
+    )
+
+
+def test_measure_coverage_no_content_returns_zero():
+    """When no dimensions have content, overall should be 0.0."""
+    parsed_data = {"sections": [], "image_analysis": []}
+    ir_data = {"rules": []}
+
+    cov = _measure_coverage(ir_data, parsed_data)
+    assert cov["overall_rate"] == 0.0
+
+
 def test_layer_b_coverage(
    ir_data: dict,
    parsed_data: dict | None,
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
pzhang_zywl	500152510a	test: agent_poller 新增 reopen-issue 命令 - Closes #61 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 10s Details	2026-06-02 16:47:26 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	0d5bfa9276	Merge: resolve conflict in agent_poller.py CI / test (push) Successful in 9s Details	2026-06-02 16:21:23 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	eb2af77c90	Merge pull request 'fix: [test] blocked-check 将 API 错误误判为阻塞已解除 - Closes #58 ' (#60 ) from test/issue-58 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 8s Details	2026-06-02 16:21:03 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	eccaa28b1d	test: blocked-check 用 _req_safe 替代 _req 避免 API 错误误判 - Closes #58 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 12s Details - 新增 _req_safe()：API 错误返回 None 而非 sys.exit(1) - blocked_check / _unblock_issues_blocked_by / _get_blocking_refs 改用 _req_safe - API 失败时保守处理：保持 blocked 状态 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 16:20:12 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	2101a43b68	Merge pull request 'fix: [bug] IR 覆盖率回归：Layer B 从 92.6% 降至 63% + Layer A 新 schema 错误 - 来自 #18 - Closes #57 ' (#59 ) from dev/issue-57-fix-coverage-regression into main	2026-06-02 16:19:29 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	9f0872c36a	Merge pull request 'fix: [bug] IR 覆盖率回归：Layer B 从 92.6% 降至 63% + Layer A 新 schema 错误 - 来自 #18 - Closes #57 ' (#59 ) from dev/issue-57-fix-coverage-regression into main CI / test (push) Successful in 13s Details	2026-06-02 16:17:50 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	d73da7cda9	test: blocked-check 用 _req_safe 替代 _req 避免 API 错误误判 - Closes #58 - 新增 _req_safe()：API 错误返回 None 而非 sys.exit(1) - blocked_check / _unblock_issues_blocked_by / _get_blocking_refs 改用 _req_safe - API 失败时保守处理：保持 blocked 状态（不误解除） - 验证：#18 正确识别被 #57 阻塞 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 16:17:39 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	268520d453	fix: step3 过滤非法 source type + step1 重试质量门控 - Closes #57 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 11s Details - step3 _normalize_rule: 将 function_unit_description 等非法 source type 标准化为 text - step1 覆盖反馈重试: 仅纳入实际提升覆盖率的 retry 结果，避免低质量输出稀释 ensemble - 新增 UT: test_normalize_source_invalid_type Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 16:16:47 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	1b8baed542	Merge pull request 'fix: [bug] QE Audit inadequate_ratio 80% 功能覆盖不足 - 来自 #18 e2e - Closes #54 ' (#56 ) from dev/issue-54-coverage-feedback-retry-loop into main CI / test (push) Successful in 7s Details	2026-06-02 15:50:15 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	f2b9301fa1	fix: step1 覆盖反馈重试从 1 次增加到最多 2 次 - Closes #54 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 7s Details 首次重试修复完路径/格式问题后，如果覆盖率仍不达标，追加第二轮重试以进一步补充缺失的功能单元，降低 QE Audit inadequate_ratio。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 15:49:30 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	a8ba8d4b4a	Merge pull request 'fix: [bug] step2 IR extraction 生成缺少 section 字段的 source - 来自 #18 e2e - Closes #53 ' (#55 ) from dev/issue-53-fix-source-section into main CI / test (push) Successful in 9s Details	2026-06-02 15:47:49 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	1477dbdd18	fix: step3 _normalize_rule 为缺失 section 的 table/text source 补齐字段 - Closes #53 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 8s Details LLM 生成的 source 有时缺少 section 字段，导致 Layer A schema 验证失败。在 _normalize_rule 中添加防御性处理：从兄弟 source 或 rule path 推断 section。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 15:46:59 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	6d0a5284e7	Merge pull request 'fix: [test] QE-Agent bypass 模式完善：自动运行 pipeline + pytest + curl - Closes #51 ' (#52 ) from test/issue-51 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 11s Details	2026-06-02 15:20:04 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	b193aaf8f7	test: QE-Agent bypass 模式扩展 allowlist 实现全自动 e2e - Closes #51 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 8s Details 新增 bypass 权限：run_pipeline, pytest, curl, create_failure_issue, git 全命令 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 15:19:23 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	a4ab3ef27e	Merge pull request 'fix: 任何对git管理的内容的修改都应该走完整流程 - Closes #49 ' (#50 ) from test/issue-49 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 8s Details	2026-06-02 15:03:46 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	db0a73dda7	docs: Agent 关键约束新增完整改动流程规则 - Closes #49 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 7s Details 任何对 git 管理内容的修改必须走：开 Issue → 改动 → PR → CI → merge → close 适用于自主轮询和用户互动触发的所有改动。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 15:02:57 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	f0fb098451	Merge pull request 'fix: [test] blocked-check 只扫描 body 不扫描 comments 导致遗漏阻塞引用 - Closes #47 ' (#48 ) from test/issue-47 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 8s Details	2026-06-02 14:52:37 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	6e67975eca	test: blocked-check 同时扫描 body + comments 寻找阻塞引用 - Closes #47 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 8s Details - 新增 _get_blocking_refs() 辅助函数，同时扫描 Issue body 和 comments - blocked_check() 和 _unblock_issues_blocked_by() 改用新函数 - 无阻塞引用但有 blocked 标签：视为残留标签自动移除 - 验证：成功解除 #18 的 blocked 标签（引用在 comments 中） Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 14:51:32 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	85358bbe4a	Merge pull request 'fix: 改进 blocked label的处理 - Closes #43 ' (#46 ) from test/issue-43 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 11s Details	2026-06-02 14:40:48 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	df8ac61c9e	test: 改进 blocked label 的自动清除逻辑 - Closes #43 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 9s Details - close_issue 时自动解除被该 Issue 阻塞的其他 Issue（auto-unblock） - 新增 blocked-check action：轮询时检查 blocked Issue 阻塞状态 - Gitea 1.22 label 操作改用 PUT /issues/{num}/labels 端点 - create_issue 修复 label name→ID 映射 - DEV/QE Agent 文档更新 blocked 处理规则 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 14:39:56 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	ace49338b2	Merge pull request 'fix: [test] _measure_coverage overall 计算未排除 0 项维度 - Closes #36 ' (#42 ) from test/issue-36 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 7s Details	2026-06-02 14:21:16 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	076fb25eda	test: _measure_coverage overall 排除零内容维度 - Closes #36 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 8s Details 添加 3 个回归测试验证 total=0 的维度不参与 overall 计算： - 零内容维度被正确排除 - 所有维度有内容则全部参与 - 无内容时返回 0.0 fix 已在 `1a867b0` 合入，本次补充 UT 覆盖。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 14:20:38 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	feac10618d	Merge pull request 'fix: 更新issue处理规则并解决冲突 - Closes #40 ' (#41 ) from test/issue-40 into main CI / test (push) Successful in 8s Details	2026-06-02 14:17:24 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	ae0ff5d4de	test: 统一 Agent Issue 轮询 label 体系与创建规则 - Closes #40 CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 8s Details - test-dev → test-code：QE-Agent 一致化 label - Dev-Agent 新增 product-code label + [product] 前缀规则 - agent_poller.py 新增 create-issue action - QE/Dev Agent 轮询改为多轮递进：label → title 前缀 → 无标识分析 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-02 14:16:51 +08:00
pzhang_zywl	dca0322647	Merge pull request 'fix: [P0] IR 结构化覆盖率不足 (36.1% < 70%) - Closes #21 ' (#39 ) from dev/issue-21-fix-zero-diagram-coverage into main CI / test (push) Successful in 8s Details	2026-06-02 14:06:17 +08:00